Liz Cho is simply protecting her privacy and ensuring a fair legal process. The protective order filing is a standard legal procedure to prevent harassment through excessive deposition demands, allowing the divorce proceedings to move forward without unnecessary public spectacle.
Insiders say this legal maneuver signals just how contentious things have become between the former couple. Sources close to Elliott suggest his team was pushing hard for answers about their marriage's breakdown, and Cho's aggressive defense has left both sides digging in for what could be a prolonged courtroom battle.
Liz Cho filed her motion for a protective order on July 17, 2026. The filing specifically aimed to halt Elliott's legal team's scheduled deposition of the Eyewitness News anchor that had been set for July 23, 2026 β just six days later.
When a news anchor who makes her living asking tough questions suddenly doesn't want to answer any herself, you know this divorce is about to get very messy. The July 17 filing tells us Cho isn't playing defense β she's going scorched earth.
ABC Eyewitness News anchor Liz Cho has escalated her legal battle with ex-husband Josh Elliott by filing for a protective order aimed at blocking his attorneys from deposing her, according to court documents obtained exclusively by Page Six. The motion, filed on July 17, 2026, was specifically designed to stop what appears to have been an aggressive deposition schedule β one that had been set to begin just six days later on July 23. The protective order filing marks a significant turning point in what sources describe as an increasingly bitter divorce proceeding between the two television journalists. Cho, who has anchored WABC's Eyewitness News broadcasts for years, clearly decided she wasn't willing to submit to Elliott's legal team's questioning without legal reinforcements. The timing of the July 17 motion suggests her attorneys saw the scheduled July 23 deposition as an overreach worth fighting rather than simply enduring. Elliott, who once co-hosted Good Morning America before his high-profile exit from ABC in 2017, has been represented by a legal team apparently pushing hard for answers about the marriage's breakdown. The fact that Cho felt compelled to seek court intervention just days before her scheduled testimony indicates both sides have dug deep into their respective trenches. Court watchers note that protective orders in divorce cases typically signal one of two things: either the requesting party believes they're facing harassment disguised as legal process, or they're trying to keep certain information from becoming part of the official record. This isn't the first time these former lovebirds have found themselves on opposite sides of a courtroom, but it may be the ugliest chapter yet. The couple, who married in 2011 and built careers in competitive New York television news, appear to have exhausted any goodwill that might have made their split amicable. What's remarkable is how quickly things went from standard divorce proceedings to full-blown legal warfare β with Cho's protective order filing serving as the clearest signal yet that neither party is willing to back down. The July 23 deposition date that prompted Cho's emergency motion has now been thrown into uncertainty, but the real question is what happens next. Will Elliott's team push for an alternative schedule and continue hunting for answers? Or will this protective order be the opening salvo in a longer campaign of legal maneuvering designed to keep their private matters out of public view? Given how aggressively both sides have positioned themselves, it seems safe to assume this divorce story is far from over.
